Archive for October, 2009

5 Things to Consider about the Home Owner’s Association before Buying

Thursday, October 1st, 2009

Written By: Kristin Duff

Home Owner’s Associations can have some pretty strict demands on your pocketbook and your lifestyle so here are a few things you should look for before buying in a neighborhood with one in place.

“I don’t know why it is that so many people don’t do more research on their homeowners association,” said Mindy Waitsman, an attorney with the Atlanta firm of Weissman, Nowack, Curry & Wilco, which represents about 900 owners associations and condo boards in the Atlanta area. “We all know at some level that our home is one of our biggest investments, but it just isn’t treated that way.”

Waitsman and others who deal regularly with the ins and outs of homeowners association rules and finances say it’s wise to gather as much information as possible about HOA finances and policies before signing a contract to purchase property within one.

Five things to check regarding the HOA governed property you’re considering:

1. Gather all the paperwork you can.

Not all associations will be forthcoming with documentation that provides a snapshot of the HOA, but minimally you or your real estate agent should be able to get copies of the bylaws or the covenants, conditions and restrictions (often referred to in shorthand as CC&Rs), according to Frank Rathbun, a spokesman for the Community Associations Institute, a Washington trade group that represents HOA interests. The CC&Rs are a blueprint for the HOA structure, laying down the rules for the board and its financial structure and how the condo building or development will be maintained.

A few other documents to look into getting are the annual budget, bylaws and regulations, board minutes and the association’s financial statement. Within those, you might get a sense of the HOA’s financial stability, whether it has ample reserve funds to cover emergencies, etc. HOA boards aren’t required to provide all this documentation to potential homeowners, but if a development has a professional management company, a manager might provide them, Waitsman said.

Getting a handle on the HOA finances is important, both Waitsman and Rathbun said — residents could be facing big increases in monthly fees or pricey special assessments, such as for roof replacement, they said.

“The reality is, community associations are businesses, and they should be run like businesses,” said Rathbun. “People have certain expectations with respect to services and amenities, and it’s the board’s obligation to provide those services and amenities.”

2. Ask About Foreclosures Within the HOA.

It might not seem important to ask about the foreclosures when you are buying, but it has become a major issue, and it should be addressed. In any locale, foreclosures can take a toll on the larger community, but they particularly impact HOAs, Waitsman said. That’s because neglected, unoccupied homes not only can be a blight, but homeowners in foreclosure probably aren’t paying their assessments. “One of the questions I would ask (of board members or management staff) is what percentage of the owners are delinquent” on their monthly assessments, she said. “Mortgage companies will certainly be asking that question.”

And if HOAs, as Rathbun said, are businesses, they can flounder just as other businesses can. At least seven Florida condo associations have filed for bankruptcy in the past couple of years, according to the Miami Herald. Most of them got into trouble not because of their own management practices, but because homeowners didn’t pay their bills. Declaring bankruptcy was necessary to keep utilities from cutting off services. Many associations have the legal right to foreclose on residents who don’t pay their annual fees, but in Florida and some other areas hard-hit by the housing economy, HOA management companies have begun to foreclose on owners who are behind.

3. “Am I a good fit for this community?”

HOAs are, in effect, a form of government, and might have rules you didn’t anticipate.

“You have to look at the restrictions, absolutely,” Waitsman said. “People don’t realize that they might not to be able to, say, put out a sign on the lawn saying you’ve just had a new baby, without their permission. Maybe you can’t have a garage sale without permission. You may think you can put in a fence, but you can’t.”

For some, certain rules have come as unwelcome surprises, occasionally leading to lawsuits over such things as erecting elaborate light shows on lawns at Christmas or even flying the American flag.

Such rules — which might also govern the size and appearance of a room addition or even a home’s paint colors — are intended to preserve the nature of the community, protect property values and meet the established expectations of the residents, Rathbun said. He said most residents seem to be comfortable with the idea of restrictions.

“In late 2007, we did a survey of community association residents, and 74 percent of them said the rules protect and enhance their community,” Rathbun said.

4. Before you buy, take a walk.

“Walk the community a few times,” Rathbun suggested. “Talk to the residents.”

Ask them if they’re happy with the way the assessments are being spent, he said. And inquire whether there’s good two-way communications between the residents and the managers or the board.

“Walk around, and you can get a sense of what it’s like living here, whether it’s well managed,” he said. Take a hard look at swimming pools, tennis courts, exercise rooms, playgrounds, etc., to gauge the attention to maintenance.

5. Is it OK to be a landlord there?

“The No. 1 thing that people don’t ever seem to ask (before they buy) is whether at some point they can lease out (the house or unit),” Waitsman said. “People never think of looking, but it’s always spelled out in the declarations.”

She said the matter varies widely from community to community — some forbid tenants, some may require an owner to wait a year before leasing, other may permit it only if they can prove financial hardship.

Waitsman said it’s not only a matter of concern to owner-investors who set out to rent immediately — in this real estate economy, homeowners who want to move may be unable to sell and renting is their only option.

California Governor Signs Important Short Sale Bill

Thursday, October 1st, 2009
Source: FresnoBailOut.com

The California Senate passed SB306 today…Expediting the Short Sale process

So the question is “what this means to home owners and the Short Sale process.

  1. If the Realtor is working with an escrow officer who has prepared a HUD1 the Lenders or Service Companies must either deny a Short Sale offer in 4 days from receiving the offer or it is assumed to be “accepted.”
  2. Lenders and Service Companies doing business in the State of California are mandated to respond to a Short Sale offer in 21 days.

This is great news, because one of the major strikes against the Short Sale is the time it takes to process…often time upwards of 120+ Days.

I have been anticipating that Government needed to get involved in the Short Sale practice as it is becoming more the mainstay in the state of California as with many other states.

I’m not sure next steps however; it is a step in the right direction.

 

Thank you Jeremy for letting me post this on my site!

Contact Jeremy Smiley:

Jeremy Smiley
Realtor
Certified Short Sale Specialist
London Properties
www.jeremysmiley.com
(559)790-8760

STATE BAR TAKES ACTION TO AID HOMEOWNERS IN FORECLOSURE CRISIS

Thursday, October 1st, 2009

STATE BAR TAKES ACTION TO AID HOMEOWNERS IN FORECLOSURE CRISIS

MEDIA CONTACT:  Diane Curtis   415-538-2028   diane.curtis@calbar.ca.gov

San Francisco, September 18, 2009 — The State Bar of California, alarmed by the number of lawyers preying on vulnerable homeowners, today identified 16 attorneys who are under investigation for misconduct related to loan modification.
“In my 21 years in attorney discipline, I have not seen a crisis of this magnitude. It is truly unprecedented,” said Interim Chief Trial Counsel Russell Weiner, who is waiving investigation confidentiality in favor of public protection. The waiver, allowed by law, is used only occasionally, but Weiner said the seriousness of the problem demanded a strong reaction by the bar in order to protect consumers. This is the first time the names of more than a few lawyers being investigated have been made public.

“The number of attorneys using their law licenses to essentially take money from unwary but trusting consumers is astounding,” Weiner added. “There are literally thousands of victims who have lost money they could not afford to lose. Under the circumstances, the need for public information and protection is paramount.”   

Those attorneys being named by the State Bar have allegedly taken fees for promised services and then failed to perform those services, communicate with their clients or return the unearned fees, Weiner said. Some attorneys misrepresented the services they could provide. “It appears these attorneys may have significantly harmed their clients who were already facing great financial pressure and the possible loss of their homes.”

About one-quarter  – almost 800 cases –  of the active investigations in the Office of Chief Trial Counsel (OTC) are related to foreclosure complaints. The office has experienced a 58 percent increase in active investigations over 2008 due in large part to the huge increase in complaints against attorneys offering loan modification services. “Our office is aggressively investigating these cases and is working proactively with law enforcement,” said Weiner.

In March of 2009, the State Bar created a special team of investigators and lawyers to handle the growing number of complaints received about attorneys offering loan modification services. OTC found that many of the offending attorneys are associated with firms that use telemarketers or phone banks to sign up clients without regard to the facts of the individual case or whether or not the client can be helped, Weiner said.
In many cases, the attorneys work with untrained non-attorney staff engaging in the unlawful practice of law by offering legal advice to prospective clients. OTC also is investigating the non-attorney staff for possible referral to law enforcement.

In recent months, OTC has obtained the resignation of three attorneys who were offering loan modification services. Those attorneys chose to give up their licenses to practice law rather than face disciplinary charges and possible disbarment. In addition, OTC lawyers are preparing to put some attorneys on inactive status pending the filing of formal disciplinary charges

Weiner warned consumers to take special caution when seeking legal representation related to loan modification. “Consumers should not be comforted by advertisements that claim the attorney is a member of the State Bar of California,” he said, noting that all attorneys practicing in California on a regular basis are members. “Such membership does not mean the attorney has any special knowledge, experience or expertise in the area of loan modification. In fact, it appears that many of the attorneys offering these services have little or no prior experience in the area of loan modification.”

The following attorneys have received a significant number of complaints related to the loan modification services they were hired to perform. They are entitled to a full and fair hearing on any charges that may be filed in the future. No discipline may be imposed unless and until the State Bar proves allegations of misconduct by clear and convincing evidence.

  • David Arase, Bar No. 233705, Costa Mesa, Arase Law Firm and National Housing Assistance
  • Stephen Burns, Bar No. 113371, Los Angeles, Legal Group Network
  • Robert Buscho, Bar No. 122556, Fullerton, United Law Group
  • Nicholas Chavarela, Bar No. 251632, Santa Ana, Rodis Law Group and America’s Law Group
  • Steven Feldman, Bar No. 103676, Mission Viejo, Feldman Law Center
  • Eric Johnson, Bar No. 224065, Culver City, Avantgarde Group
  • Paul Lucas, Bar No. 163076, Aliso Viejo, Lucas Law Center
  • Brandon Moreno, Bar No. 233750, Santa Ana, U.S. Foreclosure Relief Corp.
  • Jeffrey Nemerofsky, Bar No. 213014, Laguna Niguel, U.S. Advocacy Law Group and U.S. Financial Products
  • Gregory Paiva, Bar No. 207218,Ontario, Law Offices of Gregory Paiva
  • Adrian Pomery, Bar No. 249664, Orange, U.S. Foreclosure Relief Corp.
  • Ronald Rodis, Bar No. 181873, Newport Beach, Rodis Law Group and America’s Law Group
  • Mark Shoemaker, Bar No. 134828, Long Beach, Advocates for Fair Lending
  • Marc Tow, Bar No. 78429, Newport Beach, Marc Tow and Associates
  • Michael Yellin, Bar No. 255050, Los Angeles, A Fresh Start Loan Modification
  • Sean Rutledge, Bar No. 255938, Irvine, United Law Group

The State Bar suggests that consumers be wary of attorneys offering loan modification services under any of the following circumstances:

  • Advertisements of the office do not expressly identify by name the attorney who is responsible for the business.
  • Office staff will not readily identify by name the attorney responsible for oversight of the business.
  • The attorney in charge of the office is too busy or not willing to meet personally with prospective clients.
  • The firm advises a consumer to stop paying the existing mortgage.
  • The business, through its advertisements or claims of its representatives, makes  claims that sound too good to be true, such as claims of a 90 or 100 percent rate of success in obtaining loan modifications, or claims that a reduction in the mortgage principal is likely to be achieved. 
  • The business demands payment of a large fee, even before obtaining a prospective client’s basic income and expense information, and information about the existing mortgage and present home value.
  • The attorney responsible for the business is not licensed to practice law in the state where the consumer resides.

There are legitimate loan modification services and ethical attorneys that are providing the promised services for their clients. Two places to start in the search for loan modification assistance are: HUD Housing Counselors, 800-569-4287, http://www.hud.gov/counseling; and HOPE NOW, 888-995-HOPE, http://www.hopenow.com

Consumers can also find qualified attorneys through a State Bar-certified lawyer referral service that can be found on the State Bar’s Web site (www.calbar.ca.gov), or by calling the State Bar’s Lawyer Referral Services Directory at 1-866-442-2529 (toll free in California) or 415-538-2250 (from outside California).

Consumers having a problem with the attorney handling their loan modification may contact the State Bar at 1-800-843-9053 or visit the State Bar’s Web site at www.calbar.ca.gov to find a complaint form.

Founded in 1927 by the state legislature, the State Bar of California is an administrative arm of the California Supreme Court, serving the public and seeking to improve the justice system for more than 80 years. All lawyers practicing law in California must be members of the State Bar. In September 2009, membership reached 223,000.

13,000 Jobs Up in the Air

Thursday, October 1st, 2009

Saturn to Shut Down as Penske Deal Collapses

 

(Newser) – Saturn’s hopes of a life after GM ended today when a deal to sell the brand to Penske Automotive fell through. GM said it will now begin shutting down manufacturing and dealership operations. Penske canceled the deal—which could have saved about 13,000 jobs—because it couldn’t swing an agreement with an unnamed third party to supply vehicles, reports the Detroit Free Press.

“Without that agreement, the company has determined that the risks and uncertainties related to the availability of future products prohibit the company from moving forward with this transaction,” said a Penske statement.

John Johnson

Source: Detroit Free Press



RealtyDoctor.us is proudly designed by RET and powered by TomatoBlogs - Login